Re*Move

The Citroen SM is 40

SM brown

The title says it all really. This masterpiece of automotive design and technorama was introduced exactly 40 years ago today at the Geneva auto show, and it's been making the world a slightly better place to be ever since... with brown SM detail pic to warm the cockles of Drew Smith, Ben Kraal, Davey Johnson, Mr Charmer, and all those other #browncar #LHMluv(er's) hearts.

Sm blue

Images - hyperspace and seat850 on flickr, under creative commons license

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 11th March 2010

March 11, 2010 in Citroen, Design, SM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Geneva auto show 2010 - some things you might have missed...

By now, you'll no doubt have read all about the cars and concepts that you were interested in at last week's Geneva auto show. But if you've still apetite to digest and cogitate, Drew Smith - of the Downsideupdesign blog - and myself are producing a two part podcast with pics to cover all of the major production debuts and concepts, which you'll be able to see/hear in the next few days. For now though, you might be interested in some of the details, elements and irreverant bits and bats that I noticed in the Palexpo last week. So without further ado...

IMG_4124

Citroen reimagined the ReVolt from Frankfurt as a racer for the road in the form of the SurVolt (above). Only Citroen could get away with painting it gloss blue, matte grey, pink and orange. But they did. Note these graphics - they were quite fun, a play on PCBs - used to signify the electric drivetrain.

IMG_4142

Meanwhile over at Mercedes (above), they'd got wood... (sorry, couldn't resist). The use of wood laminates in this interior was fantastic - it vied with the Pegueot (see below) for concept interior of the show, and previews an altogether more 'light of touch' future Mercedes interior design language...

IMG_4153

Peugeot marked its return to form with the SR1 (although special note to the glorious bike also on the stand) - which previews the brand's altogether more acceptable new face (thank god the rictus grin's gone). But it was the interior that really stood out in this car...great work Julien et al:

IMG_4456

Speaking of gorgeous things, here's a shot of the superb little Pininfarina Alfa Duettotanta that makes me go a little bit weak at the knees...

IMG_4214

Continue reading "Geneva auto show 2010 - some things you might have missed..." »

March 09, 2010 in Analysis, Aston Matin, Audi, Auto, autoshows, Citroen, Design, Designers, Drew Smith, Geneva, Honda, Juke, Materials, Mercedes, Nissan, Observations, Peugeot, Photos, Podcasts, Porsche, Toyota, VW | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Can we stop using car clinics now please?

C-cactus-001

You may remember us raving over Citroen's C-Cactus concept from Frankfurt 2007, some time ago. It wasn't just the design we liked though. Parts reduction, light-weight tech and pared, basic simplicity-of-thought got us fired up too. But it was the fact that Citroen said they were actually going to production-ise the thing that really got us excited.

After the marketing-led disappointment that is the DS sub-line (at least in its initial, DS3 form), the production Cactus was what we holding out for from Citroen.

While we weren't expecting the Cactus to make it to market in unfettered form, we'd hoped the principals and ideas behind the concept would win through. However, a report in autocar this week suggests that some of the pared back simplicity of the concept vehicle will now be junked in favour of more kit, and greater complexity for the production version - because the stripped concept was "too radical" for customer tastes:

"The Citroen C-Cactus concept car will reach production in a different form, after customer clinics questioned the car’s back-to-basics interior.

Research has uncovered aspects of the car that potential buyers were not happy with. The lack of dashboard and the way its instruments are clustered around the steering column were said to be particularly off-putting.

Citroen is also considering fitting electric windows instead of the concept’s wind-up units, which reduce complexity."

I wonder when car makers are going to give up on these types of customer clinics, which only ever seem to produce 'negative' responses resulting in radical design and ideas rejected in favour of conservatism? At the risk of sounding like a stuck record, to quote Henry Ford: "If I'd have asked people what they wanted, they'd have said a faster horse"...

Understanding the customer's needs, aspirations and desires is a critical part of launching a successful product, but if the car industry really wants to inovate; to move beyond the current mess it's still in, then can we politely suggest that they ditch clinicing like this? BMW, Ford and others claim to have. So why are the original innovators - Citroen - still at it?

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 4th February 2010

February 04, 2010 in Analysis, Citroen, Design, Research | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)

Videos a go-go: Frankfurt auto show 2009 concept car videos

There was a huge amount to see in Frankfurt, so if you're pushed for time and want the quick whizz-around check out my "Frankfurt in Four minutes" review video. However, on the off-chance that you missed some of the concepts or want to have a (slightly) longer look, I've clipped out some 2-minute long videos for a few of the key concepts. So, without further ado, here's the:

BMW efficient Dynmaics Concept:

Renault Twizy:

Citroen ReVolte:

Renault Zoe and the 'ZE' range video:

As with the four minute video, you can watch most of these in HD mode, so it's worth clicking through to Youtube (logo in bottom right corner) and then clicking on high quality mode if you want them to see them in full, clear view. We'll have more thoughts and a bit of indepth coverage on some of these, plus more Frankfurt coverage, shortly.

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 18th September 2009

September 21, 2009 in Auto, autoshows, BMW, Citroen, Frankfurt, Renault, Video | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Frankfurt in four minutes - IAA 2009 review video

Frankfurt auto show is so huge that, even having spent three days there, it's hard to cover everything that's in the halls of the Messe. So here's a fairly personalised view of the 2009 Frankfurt auto show, edited into just four minutes. There are things in here that will doubtless seem strange to you, and there are plenty of interesting things missing - simply becasue I didn't get time to video them, but hopefully you'll enjoy and get a flavour of what it was like to be there. Note, if you click through and run this in Youtube, you can watch it in HD too.

Just in case you watched it and are intrigued as to what certain things are, then in rough order from the top that was:

BMW's Vision Efficient Dynamics concept, The Mercedes Gullwing (nee SLS), the original Smart concept from 1994, Aston's Rapide, Ford of Europe's CEO John Fleming, Renault Nissan CEO Carlos Gohsn, the Renault Twizy, Joe Paluska of Better Place, Better Place's battery swap system, Mini's (loud) birthday celebrations, details of various cars  and concepts - BMW, Citroen, Renault, Aston, the fold away seat in the Ford Grand C-Max, Mark getting annoyed at being filmed, Stefan Lamm - Ford of Europe's exterior design director, talking about touch screen HMI influences, BMW's touch screen concept Apps store, the HMI in the Hyundai iX Metro concept, and finally Drew Smith enjoying saving the environment...

More video and thoughts from Frankfurt are on their way. Check back soon...

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 18th September 2009

September 18, 2009 in Aston Matin, Auto, autoshows, BMW, Citroen, Design, Drew Smith, Events and debates, EVs, Frankfurt, Mercedes, Renault, User Interface, Video | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Images of Frankfurt

IMG_8024

I spent just one day at the 2009 Frankfurt Auto Show and barely covered more than a couple of halls. But here's the stuff I saw that interested me. Click on the collage below or here.

Picture 9

Press day. Frankfurt Auto Show. 15 September 2009.

Posted by Mark Charmer. Mark is managing director of The Movement Design Bureau.

September 16, 2009 in Citroen, Design, Designers, EVs, Ford, Frankfurt, SAAB | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

New Cars vs Old Cars II

chimneys.jpg

Can you help us to get to the bottom of a crucial question? Is it cleaner, greener, and more environmentally friendly to replace your old car (let’s call ‘old’ 10 years+ for the sake of argument), with a new one?

It’s pertinent, because a ‘scrapping’ scheme has just been launched in Germany, and is being considered in the UK. Consumers are offered €2500 off the sticker price of a new car, provided they scrap their old, ‘dirty’ banger. It’s had a big effect in Germany. New car sales, which had fallen ‘off a cliff’ before Christmas, show a massive upswing since the scheme’s introduction.

Unsurprisingly, the world’s ailing auto industry is lobbying for the rollout of the scheme across other countries. Yet writer and campaigner George Monbiot asks serious questions of it today, arguing that from an environmental perspective "we might as well burn ten-pound notes in power stations”.

Monbiot’s chief issues are:

  • It’s being dressed up by media and auto as ‘green’ and aiming to reduce CO2, when new cars aren’t actually that much more efficient than they were 10 years ago.
  • That there’s no incentive to buy low CO2 cars specifically – consumers need merely buy any new car meeting the Euro4/5 emissions laws (which all do today).
  • That (and you need to take his figures with a pinch of salt) essentially, the scheme equates every tonne of CO2 saved to be worth £2525, when existing schemes cost as little as £3.50 per tonne saved.

At this point it would be customary to highlight the flaws in Monbiot’s logic, but that’s very hard to do, because we haven’t yet found anyone in the auto industry who can provide a decent set of facts to back up the environmental argument for scrapping an old car and getting a new one. In Geneva last week, in conversations we’ve had with people in the industry and on this blog, we’ve asked the question but haven't yet found an answer.

Instead we can pick holes in the merit of Monbiot arguing “So £2000 from the government could help you trade in your old Citroen C1 for a new Porsche Cayenne.” First, he must mean a Citroen Saxo, as the C1 is too young, as a model, to qualify for scrapping. But it’s somewhat churlish given the lack of any true counter evidence that his wider argument is wrong.

Working from the way we live now

I do believe he’s missing a trick however. Monbiot’s articles are characterised by an attempt to be factually water-tight and reference-based. But they rarely illustrate new, better visions and often ignore some inconvenient truths about the way people live their lives. He’s still banging on about the frankly bizarre idea of coach-only motorway lanes… and ignores the fact that – in reality – a reasonable portion of people are likely to use a private, rather than shared, vehicle.

Two points then. First, if the auto industry wants governments to implement scrapping-type schemes, it needs to show people why this is a good idea from an environmental perspective. Someone needs to take a lead and attempt to answer the question. Of course it’s hard to answer conclusively – it differs on a case-by-case basis. But so what? Monbiot extrapolates some of his figures, so shouldn’t the car industry where data is hard to come by? Why not take a model of 15 years ago, and compare its CO2, NOx, recycled material content, etc. and compare with the equivalent vehicle today. Explain about pollutants beyond CO2 – which are important. Explain how much energy goes into building new cars – and how that’s being produced. Turn it into an example case study, and create a counter argument to Monbiot. We’ll even come and shoot the video if you want, and shove it on to youtube so consumers can make their own mind up. Simply doing nothing makes the industry look like it has something to hide – when most of those connected to it do believe it is changing – fast.

This leads to my second point – and where I take issue with Monbiot suggesting:

“It is hard to think of a less deserving cause. The motor companies have repeatedly failed to anticipate trends in demand. They have carried on producing thunderous gas guzzlers long after the market collapsed.”

While few could argue with the point that the auto industry’s issues are largely of it’s own making, Monbiot’s argument is lazy and out of date. The gas guzzler argument is questionable – but alludes to a critical point, which the current crisis provides an opportunity to do something about. This is that the trends of car buying consumers, and the design and development of vehicles exist in a relationship that is massively out of step. Five years ago, many consumers – regardless of what Monbiot thinks – did want gas guzzlers. And if you’d have been running an auto company, you’d have made them too – because they’re high profit vehicles. Small eco-boxes aren’t.

Yet when consumer demand suddenly fell away, it wasn’t that the industry carried on churning out thunderous gas guzzlers – it’s that its processes meant it couldn’t react quickly enough. Tens of large, sports and SUV programmes have been abandoned presently. But many of the small, hybrid and electric cars people apparently want are still on the drawing board, because although car companies know demand is there now, it wasn’t four years ago when today’s cars were first being conceived.



Likewise, factory production demands many factories churn out 200,000 models to make sense (see the great Bob Casey talking about this and related auto industry history in the video above). But they don’t make sense when there are no buyers for those vehicles. So the ‘crisis’ needs to be an opportunity – to create shorter development processes, link designers and engineers with consumers (currently, they rarely meet), and attempt to massively reduce lead times. Ultimately, the mass production model may be a busted flush – now is the moment for ideas on how it can be at worst improved, and at best replaced. To radically change the industry will require pain and job losses in the short term. Yet doing nothing – and propping up the industry with schemes such as the car scrappage programme, risks losing this opportunity, and simply postponing dealing with these ongoing issue for another day. Allowing the industry to carry on conducting ‘business as usual’ ultimately risks allowing it to inflict upon itself a slow and painful death.

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 10 March 2009.

Photograph: After 3 years on The Movement Design Bureau homepage, Mark retired the lead photo in this piece just this morning. And then we realised it would be perfect for this article. How about that for a retirement moment?

March 10, 2009 in Analysis, Auto, Citroen, Design, Designers, Politics, Sustainability | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

Geneva 2009: It gets worse - Citroen launches DS Inside, erm, inside... (?!)

dsc04967.jpg

Over on Downsideupdesign, Drew Smith has been expanding on the curious case of the new Citroen DS Inside. Those of us attending the Geneva show this week were all puzzled by Citroen's decision to launch the car concept, quite literally, inside. A box.

Citroen chose to show a model with which - let's not forget - it plans to launch a whole new sub-brand, inside a confined, dark box, to which I, and many others, were denied access.

Not that we appear to have missed much. Drew speaks for many I spoke to on the day, when he asks: 

"Is Citroen ashamed of the DS Inside? Or more specifically, are they ashamed of using the DS name on such an underwhelming product?"...

...continue reading the rest of his thoughts, and see more photos, here.

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 6 March 2009. Photo credit: Drew Smith

March 05, 2009 in Analysis, autoshows, Citroen, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Is Citroen taking the wrong line with the 'new' DS?

DS Inside The new Citroen DS Inside - a concept preview of the first in a series of three new Citroen 'DS line' models

A few months back, I penned a piece for Car Design News reviewing the Paris Motorshow (subscription required), and concluded by saying of Citroen:

“Many felt that [its various show cars]… provided evidence of the French company's current leadership in design and innovation; one which doesn't require obvious retro references, or need to shout about green-ness in order to appeal to a new type of digitally-engaged, design-literate and environmentally aware young consumer.”

This rather bold statement wasn’t unfounded. In Paris’s auto salon, Citroen unveiled two show-stopping stars – the Hypnos and ConceptGT – along with the production car of the show – the C3 Picasso. This after concepts such as the C-Matisse, C-Cactus, and production C4, C5 and C6 had taken the car design world by storm. Ask most, and they’ll tell you Jean Pierre Ploue’s team are close to the top of the automotive design pile.

IMG_6273.JPG IMG_6479.JPG
Above - ConceptGT and Hypnos were stars of the Paris Auto Salon

Yet Citroen’s unveiling of the DS Inside Concept makes my praise look high-handed, and Citroen like they’ve fallen off the innovation wagon.  Let’s be blunt. There’s nothing wrong with this car, it looks okay – nice even. Ultimately though, is it unfair to have expected more from a model which pillages the name of Citroen’s most beautiful, advanced vehicle ever? Not that I’d hoped for retro design cues - no, count me very glad they haven’t gone down the obvious retro route favoured by BMW (Mini), Fiat (500) and VW (Beetle)…

Instead, it looks on reflection that this vehicle has come straight from the minds of Citroen’s marketing department. And that is the antithesis of its 1950s namesake. As LJK Setright points out in his book Drive On!: A social history of the motorcar:

“The [original] DS was an engineer’s car, the thinking man’s car, far and away the most modern car in the world, not only in 1955 but for at least 15 years…”


Deessee '50's DS (above) thought one of the most beautiful automobile designs of all time
 
In the early fifties, the car whose name is a shortening of the French “Déessee” – literal translation “goddess” – shocked the world with Flaminio Bertoni’s stunning styling, and a raft of technical advances including: high pressure hydraulics, self-levelling suspension, power brakes, automatic clutch, headlights that turned with the wheel, disc brakes and radial-ply tyres. Quite simply, it fulfilled Boulanger’s brief of being “The world’s most beautiful, most comfortable and most advanced car…”

It is arguably, as Stephen Bailey suggests, “the single greatest automobile design of all time”, but I believe it was the spirit of innovation and technical tour-de-force specification that Citroen should have paid homage to in any new model. In reinterpreting the DS, Citroen had the opportunity to do something truly innovative. The new DS didn’t have to be beautiful, it didn’t have to be retro – but it did have to be smart. And while it’s always dangerous to criticse a car before seeing it in the flesh, or driving it, I see little true automotive innovation going on in the DS Inside.

Are my expectations unfair? After all, Citroen stress ‘DS’ now stands for ‘Distinct Series', and will apply to a new range of (initially three) cars, that stand out as more up market, distinct Citroens. No one is in any doubt Citroen is chasing some of the Mini’s market here (frankly, who isn’t these days?) – they’ve even given it a white roof. Perhaps in part, that’s driven by a frustration that Citroen seems to have acquired a reputation as a cheap, value brand – one that shifts cars through constant cash-back deals or ‘pay no VAT’ offers in the UK.

So could the upmarket DS-line approach work? With ever cheaper, small car offerings not only from BMW’s Mini, but now Alfa, and very soon VW and Audi – it’d be a brave person to predict that the demographic of person who’s typical attracted to the premium, expensive, less-is-more car, will go for something from a maker of cheap, small French cars.

I’ll hold out hope the next two ‘DS’ cars will do the name more justice. But I can’t help think Citroen is both mis-judging this, and missing a massive opportunity. Of all the European brands, Citroen is best placed to ‘get away with’ experimental, innovative and even wild-looking cars. We know they are capable of creating truly intelligent, eye-catching and, yes, innovative designs – see the C3 Picasso – and redemption may be at hand in the form of a productionised version of the C-Cactus.  Brands only get one attempt at raiding their historic nameplate bin. Screw it up with a modern model, and people will hate you for ruining an iconic name - bound up with romantic memories and historic baggage (VW Beetle).

IMG_6467.JPG IMG_6837.JPG
C3 Picasson and C-Cactus show great innovation, befitting of the DS name

To me, that’s what Citroen have done here. If the original DS was “the essence of petit-bourgeois advancement” (Barthes), then the new DS line simply says something depressing about the lack of sophistication of today’s car buyer (or rather, does if Citroen succeed with it). Ultimately, it says something ugly about the cynical nature of automotive marketing departments – and hints at so much that is currently wrong with the wider automotive industry at large. To have turned over the name DS, and allowed the marketing department – rather than engineers and designers – to oversee its reinvention, must have Bertoni, Boulanger and co. turning in their graves. As Mark put it to me: “if LJK Setright had still been alive, his beard would have fallen off”

Posted by Joseph Simpson on 19th February 2009

Images: DS Inside - Citroen; Black and White DS - Elchtest on Flickr under creative commons; all others Joseph Simpson

February 19, 2009 in Analysis, Citroen, Design, Designers, Products & Services | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)

About us

Share our material


  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

Search

  • Search Re*Move

Recent Posts

  • The debacle of Denmark Hill station
  • '70s Fords in Camberwell
  • Vinay Gupta on Wolverhampton: 1
  • City Camp presentation on Wolves
  • Getting started in Wolverhampton
  • On cathedrals, new and old
  • Jaguar's 75th Birthday bash
  • Lunch in the park with Robert Brook
  • iPad - The best things come to those who wait
  • The trouble with eight-point plans

Back to our home page...

  • The Movement Design Bureau

Archives

  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010

More...